安全玻璃和玻璃材料檢測

安全玻璃和玻璃材料檢測項目報價？??解決方案？??檢測周期？??樣品要求？

點 擊 解 答??

GB/T 8411.2-2008陶瓷和玻璃絕緣材料.第2部分:試驗方法

GB/T 8411的本部分適用于電絕緣用陶瓷、玻璃陶瓷、玻璃結合云母和玻璃材料。本部分規定了試驗方法，目的在于用這些方法測出試樣所用材料的典型性能參數。在多數情況下，電絕緣陶瓷部件的尺寸和形狀與試樣相差很遠，因此這些測試所得出的結果僅是實際部件特性的指導性參數。對試樣成型和試樣處理方法的要求在相關處討論。

GB/T 29908-2013玻璃幕墻和門窗抗爆炸沖擊波性能分級及檢測方法

本標準規定了建筑幕墻和門窗防爆炸沖擊波性能的術語和定義、分級、試件、試驗場地和儀器設備、檢測步驟、數據處理、結果判定和檢測報告。本標準適用于以玻璃為面板材料的幕墻和門窗的防爆炸沖擊波性能分級及檢測。其他建筑構件的防爆炸沖擊波性能檢測可參照使用。

GB 50384-2016煤礦立井井筒及硐室設計規范

本規范適用于煤礦立井井筒及相關硐室工程的設計。

YY/T 0964-2014外科植入物 生物玻璃和玻璃陶瓷材料

本標準規定了外科植入物用生物玻璃和玻璃陶瓷的材料要求和測試技術,本標準所述材料可用于多孔狀和粉末狀外科植入物,也可用于外科器械的涂層,但不包括藥物輸送系統。生物玻璃和玻璃陶瓷與骨和軟組織的生物學反應已經在臨床應用和實驗室研究中得到驗證。本標準不包含合成羥基磷灰石、羥基磷灰石涂層,氧化鋁陶瓷,α-磷酸三鈣和β-磷酸三鈣以及白磷鈣石。

HB/Z 5123-1979鎂合金鑄造

本技術文件適用于HB964-70中的ZM-1、ZM-2、ZM-3、ZM-5合金的鑄造。

JB/T 8856-2018溶解乙炔設備

本標準規定了溶解乙炔設備的術語和定義、壓力分等與產品分類、技術要求、試驗方法、檢驗規則以及標志、包裝、運輸和貯存。本標準適用于以電石為原料生產溶解乙炔、產量大于或等于20 m<上標3>/h的溶解乙炔設備。管道輸送乙炔的乙炔設備可參照執行。本標準不適用于國防、鐵路和航運系統的專用乙炔設備。

ASTM C158-2002(2007)玻璃的撓曲標準試驗方法(測定玻璃撓折模量)

1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the modulus of rupture in bending of glass and glass-ceramics.1.2 These test methods are applicable to annealed and prestressed glasses and glass-ceramics available in varied forms. Alternative test methods are described; the test method used shall be determined by the purpose of the test and geometric characteristics of specimens representative of the material.1.2.1 Test Method A is a test for modulus of rupture of flat glass.1.2.2 Test Method B is a comparative test for modulus of rupture of glass and glass-ceramics.1.3 The test methods appear in the following order:Sections Test Method A6 to 9 Test Method B10 to 51.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazard statements are given in Section 10 and A1.5, A2.3.3, A2.4.3 and A2.5.3.

ASTM C158-2002(2012)玻璃撓曲強度標準試驗方法(斷裂模量測定)

4.1x00a0;For the purpose of this test, glasses and glass-ceramics are considered brittle (perfectly elastic) and to have the property that fracture normally occurs at the surface of the test specimen from the principal tensile stress. The modulus of rupture is considered a valid measure of the tensile strength subject to the considerations discussed below. 4.2x00a0;It is recognized that the modulus of rupture for a group of test specimens is influenced by variables associated with the test procedure. These include the rate of stressing, test environment, and the area of the specimen subjected to stress. Such factors are specified in the test procedure or required to be stated in the report. 4.3x00a0;It is also recognized that the variables having the greatest effect on the modulus of rupture value for a group of test specimens are the condition of the surfaces and glass quality near the surfaces in regard to the number and severity of stress-concentrating discontinuities or flaws, and the degree of prestress existing in the specimens. Each of these can represent an inherent part of the strength characteristic being determined or can be a random interfering factor in the measurement. 4.4x00a0;Test Method A is designed to include the condition of the surface of the specimen as a factor in the measured strength. It is, therefore, desirable to subject a fixed and significant area of the surface to the maximum tensile stress. Since the number and severity of surface flaws in glass are primarily determined by manufacturing and handling processes, this test method is limited to products from which specimens of suitable size can be obtained with minimal dependence of measured strength upon specimen preparation techniques. This test method is therefore designated as a test for modulus of rupture of flat glass. 4.5x00a0;Test Method B describes a general procedure for test, applicable to specimens of rectangular or elliptical cross section. This test method is based on the assumption that a comparative measurement of strength on groups of specimens is of significance for many purposes, such as determining the effect of environment or stress duration, or the effectiveness of varied prestressing techniques or strengths characteristic of glass-ceramics of differing composition or heat treatment. In this test method the surfaces of the specimens are not assumed to be characteristic of a product or material, but are considered to be determined by the procedures used to prepare the specimens. Though the stated procedure permits a wide variation in both specimen size and test geometry, it is necessary to use identical test conditions and equivalent procedures for specimen preparation to obtain comparable strength values. The use of a controlled abrasion of the specimen as a final normalizing procedure is recommended for such comparative tests. 4.6x00a0;A comparative abraded strength, determined as suggested in Test Method B, is not to be considered as a minimum value characteristic of the material tested nor as directly related to a maximum attainable strength value through test of specimens with identical flaws. The operationally defined abrasion procedure undoubtedly produces flaws of differing severity when applied to varied materials, and the measured comparative strengths describe the relative ability to withstand externally induced stress as affected by the specific abrasion procedure. 1.1x00a0;These t......

ASTM C169-2016堿石灰和硼硅酸鹽玻璃的化學分析的標準試驗方法

3.1x00a0;These test methods can be used to ensure that the chemical composition of the glass meets the compositional specification required for the finished glass product. 3.2x00a0;These test methods do not preclude the use of other methods that yield results within permissible variations. In any case, the analyst should verify the procedure and technique employed by means of a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference material having a component comparable with that of the material under test. A list of standard reference materials is given in the NIST Special Publication 260,3 current edition. 3.3x00a0;Typical examples of products manufactured using soda-lime silicate glass are containers, tableware, and flat glass. 3.4x00a0;Typical examples of products manufactured using borosilicate glass are bakeware, labware, and fiberglass. 3.5x00a0;Typical examples of products manufactured using fluoride opal glass are containers, tableware, and decorative glassware. 1.1x00a0;These test methods cover the quantitative chemical analysis of soda-lime and borosilicate glass compositions for both referee and routine analysis. This would be for the usual constituents present in glasses of the following types: (1) soda-lime silicate glass, (2) soda-lime fluoride opal glass, and (3) borosilicate glass. The following common oxides, when present in concentrations greater than indicated, are known to interfere with some of the determinations in this method: 28201;% barium oxide (BaO), 0.28201;% phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5), 0.058201;% zinc oxide (ZnO), 0.058201;% antimony oxide (Sb2O3), 0.058201;% lead oxide (PbO). 1.2x00a0;The analytical procedures, divided into two general groups, those for referee analysis, and those for routine analysis, appear in the following order: x00a0; x00a0; Sections Procedures for Referee Analysis: x00a0; x00a0;